SOME
OF THE MOST efficient firearms sought by terrorists -- international
as well as domestic -- may flood the markets of this country
if Congress fails to renew a federal ban on semiautomatic assault-style
weapons. The ban is scheduled to expire next year after a decade
in force; House Majority Leader Tom DeLay (R-Tex.) announced
at one point recently that the House would not even have a vote
on the matter. But House Speaker J. Dennis Hastert (R-Ill.)
then insisted that no final decision had been made, noting that
he first wants to talk to President Bush, who has been on record
as supporting the ban. That's the right position, but it will
take more than presidential lip service to uphold it in an election
year.
The
1994 law made it illegal to manufacture, transfer or possess
19 specific models of semiautomatic weapons. It also banned
ammunition magazines that hold more than 10 rounds. If anything,
the law needs to be strengthened. A Congressional Research Service
report released last week found that U.S. gun laws in general
can be easily exploited by terrorist operatives shopping for
weapons in this country. In the case of assault weapons, the
gun industry has found clever ways to make cosmetic design changes
in their models to get around the federal ban. Even so, according
to the Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence, every major law
enforcement organization in the country has supported the ban.
These groups point out that these firearms remain the weapons
of choice for drug traffickers, gangs and paramilitary groups.
As weak as the ban may be, evidence exists that the number of
assault weapons traced to crimes dips when such laws are in
place. In Maryland, for example, a ban on assault pistols took
effect in June 1994. The Brady Center found that the number
of these guns recovered by Baltimore police in the first six
months of 1995 was down 45 percent from the comparable period
the year before.
The
ban on assault weapons needs time and broadening to have more
effect. Reopening the gates to still more assault weapons makes
no sense in civilized society. Congress and the president ought
not make it any easier for terrorists, deranged people, drive-by
shooters or criminals -- foreign or domestic -- to kill and
maim.